#Free 3270 terminal emulator for mac archive#

that is very attractive: it decouples technology ('spin up another Linux Today if you had to pay $10,000 for your first license? And running moreĬopies or more MIPS of Linux does not directly increase your software costs How many companies would be running Linux Not the availability of source* per se but the fact that you can start forįree and decouple growth and cost. I think what attracts enterprise customers is Send email to with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

#Free 3270 terminal emulator for mac archive#

Have to pay a reasonable license fee and can only provide my changes toĪre you actually seeing resistance to priced software, or only to OCOįor IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, My preference isįor well maintained software to which I can easily make local changes. There's room for both open source and proprietary software. In other words, they *want* localĬustomization to be parameters plus object code, not source code. To do with a piece of assembler source if you gave it to them. Many, many customers nowadays would not know what ?'įrankly I don't think I have seen any resistance to OCO in twenty years, Tom Brennan's Vista - my preferred emulator but not an option for the Mac - costs $30 for a single user.įrom: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin

Why are computer people so loathe to financially reward computer people? Why the determination not to financially reward the developers for their efforts? Why would I hypothetically write a 3270 emulator if it's not important enough to pay for? If I have to pay a reasonable license fee and can only provide my changes to people who are licensed, that's fine.Īre you actually seeing resistance to priced software, or only to OCO software?įrom: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Charles Mills Saturday, Ma5:04 PM My preference is for well maintained software to which I can easily make local changes.